I inherited my love for agriculture from my
grandfather, Tully B. Caldwell. My grandfather was a
well-respected, talented
Lincoln County,
Kentucky farmer who was known for his
skills at building homes. He learned those skills
from his father who helped him clear a 120-acre forest to begin farming
on his own in an area now known as Pond.
Once the forest was harvested, it was now time to
put that timber to good use by building barns, fences, outbuildings and
a large two-story home. It was the building of the
home that gave grandpa the skills to build many homes around Waynesburg.
Then the Great Depression hit hard, not only rural
Kentucky, but also all of
America.
When there was no work to be found locally to feed a family of eight, it
was grandpa’s carpenter skills that enabled him to find work in
Alabama building homes for the
Tennessee Valley Authority. My grandmother and her
six children maintained the farm while Grandpa would spend months at a
time in
Alabama but always making it back for
tobacco harvest.
However, it was farming that Grandpa considered
his primary occupation. By the time I was born and
remember vacationing in the summer at his farm, he had retired from
building houses. He received from the Governor of
Kentucky an award recognizing him as a Kentucky Colonel.
The recognition was not for building homes that would last a
century, but recognition for his production skills as a farmer.
He raised horned
Hereford cattle and his feeder calves
brought the highest prices at the
Garrard
County stockyards one fall
prompting the Governor to recognize him. Probably
the only award he ever won in his lifetime.
If Tully Caldwell was forty and alive today, he
probably would be a full-time homebuilder. In
today’s agricultural economic climate, Grandpa’s 120-acre tobacco, beef
farm would not be viable. Not because he did not
possess the production skills needed to compete, but because of intense
world competition. He could not have sustained the
number of cattle and tobacco acres needed to generate enough income to
feed his family and pay the taxes on his 120-acre hill farm.
Which finally brings me to today’s issue:
Why do dairy farms have to have 2400 cows to compete?
This summer I was visiting
Mad
River
Township farmer, Kevin
Welsheimer, who asked the question many people have lately:
“Why do we have to build these new dairies for 2400 cows instead
of four to six new dairies of 400-600 cows each?”
That’s a fair question so here is my attempt to answer it.
I grew up in
Brown
County in an era in which
almost every farm had livestock. In 1964, I was a
FFA student with beef projects. I would pay market
prices for a load of corn, which cost me $1.30 per bushel.
As I write this article, elevators are paying $1.65 per bushel
for a load of corn. That is an increase of 27%.
That same year, I could have bought a new car for $1,800.00 and
farmland for $150.00 per acre. Farmland prices have
risen 2000% and cars 1500% since 1964.
America
is no longer the world’s great exporter. We have
tremendous competition from countries that were non-existent in 1964 in
export markets such as
Brazil,
China, and
Argentina.
In
South America, cropland sells for $75.00 to
$300.00 per acre and labor is almost nothing compared to
U.S. wages.
As a result, world competition has driven down profits per unit,
acre, sow, cow, etc.
Technology advances have also contributed to
increased farm competition, in not only the world, but also here at
home. In 1964, a farmer would spend 13 hours of
labor producing a field crop. Today, large producers
can grow corn averaging three hours of labor per acre and soybeans with
only two.
Agriculture has become specialized.
Knowledge has grown so rapidly that farmers need to specialize in
producing crops, milk, or sows. Especially in
livestock, those who only farrow hogs or milk cows are so much more
efficient than general farms. Their pigs per litter
per year and milk production per cow may double those on general farms.
OSU production budgets show losses for average
producers in pork, dairy, and beef and profits of only $30.00 per acre
for field crops. With narrow margins like this, it
takes many sows, cows, and acres to feed a family today and pay the
taxes, insurance, and college tuition.
The demand by the public for environmental
regulations has also driven farming to large units.
It takes a lot of cows and sows to pay for manure and storm water
storage facilities. A man with 100 sows or cows
cannot afford them. These fixed costs need to be
spread over many units.
Economies of scale is real my friend.
The larger you are, the more competitive you are.
If you don’t believe me, look at Wal-Mart.
They don’t believe their current stores will be competitive in the
future. Stores only ten years old are being replaced
with larger ones called Super Wal-Marts.
Margins in dairy production are so narrow it’s
going to take 1500 to 4000 cows to pay for expensive
U.S. labor and environmental
regulations. Unlike Wal-Mart, our dairies cannot
tear buildings down in ten years to build larger ones.
The dairies built today must be positioned to compete twenty
years from now.
This is but a few of the many economic reasons
that have driven
Ohio farm numbers to decline by 50%
since 1964.
Tully
Caldwell was a great man.
However, his farm would never have survived today in today’s
current economic climate. In fact, it sets idle.
Without sustained growth many of today’s farms will set idle,
become part of another mega producer, or, unfortunately, become part of
the urban scene.
Back to
top